Today's critique is brought to you by Dirzha.Scores:
Overall: 4.5/5
Composition: 4/5
Emotion: 3.5/5
Innovation: 4/5
Overall: I really like the colors and the depth of field of this piece. It seems to lack emotion, just a little, but, then, I'm not feeling well today, so maybe I'm just missing it.
Composition: The colors and the depth of field are gorgeous. The water droplet is so crisp, too. I think, maybe, I'd increase the depth of field a little so that a tiny bit of the area in front of the droplet is in focus, too.
Emotion: There isn't a whole lot of emotion immediately obvious in this photo. It make me want to stare at it, though, which is a plus, because it captivates the part of me that enjoys art.
Innovation: I find it amusing that as soon as I sat down to prepare to critique this, a similar photo showed up in my inbox. However, before that, I'd never seen anything like it. Very nice.
About Dirzha:
Dirzha's been a photographer for something like ten years now. However, she started with digital photography two years ago. In a way, the two mediums are vastly different, but, for the most part, they're quite similar. Macro isn't normally something she does, and this photo is one of her first real "macro" shots.
Tip of the day:
A narrow depth of field can eliminate distractions in the background of your photos. At the same time, it can sometimes make things blurry without your permission. Anyhow, try it out if you can.
Thank you so much for the Critique and you also noticed all what I myself noticed with this photograph, also it's not really a new found idea I know ;)
ReplyDeleteWater droplets on feathers are very common but everyone of them seem to be different in their own little way :)
The only thing that is different for me when it comes to photographing digital is the effect of the light it takes up and the fact that it's so much more to take in, before I have used a camera from the 1920, an old thing I fell in love with ages ago.
Landscape only photographing I have to add ;)